
2. Definitely a hard R on this book, despite strong pervasive language (meaning obscenities throughout), there are also quite a few instances of male and female frontal nudity, most notably at the beginning of the story (sorry, the pages aren't numbered) during a medical examination and towards the end where the villain behind the slayings is "exposed," shall we say.
3. Most impressive was the realistic dialogue, most notably the correct application (or at least the appearance of correct) police procedural language. The way Walker and Deena swept a scene, interrogated suspects, continually rehashed the events of the crimes they investigated with each other, all has that ring of authenticity. Having a police officer in the family one begins to notice they have a certain way with language, sentences are short, terse, and efficient, containing as much information with as a few words as possible. When on the job Walker and Deena talk with each other and to victims and suspects in this way.
4. Finally, an application portion of my response that doesn’t exist in the realm of vague adherence to implied knowledge, but an opportunity to actually apply researched knowledge from the graphic novel. Bendis's use of police procedural language is something my story needs. There will be several interactions with the police in my story and making sure they speak realistically, using the words and phrases police officers actually use, will help sell potential viewers on the authenticity of my story.
No comments:
Post a Comment